Criterion E

Criterion A: Investigation
For the investigation, we were supposed to write the process of how we started out our artwork. We had to include the media for the artwork we were going to use, how the medias represent us, how we edited our photos on the editing programs online.
I basically wrote all of these things that we should have done. Maybe i could have tried to make it more specific or detailed. I also could have spent more time on describing the editing of my photos, because i think that i started off talking about the artwork and nothing to do with IT.

Criterion B: Design
In Design, we were supposed to make a range of designs, about 4 or more to get a good grade, write out design specifications - the ones we wrote in class and some of our own, and then evaluate each picture to the design specifications. We also were meant to write why we chose the final picture that we chose.
I had 4 different designs, some of which i had to do after picking the final one i was going to use for the project. After doing the designs i wrote my designs specifications and evaluated each design to the specifications and i think i clearly stated why i chose my final work.
I could have spent more time on the evaluation to the design specifications, but overall i think that i did a good job on those.

Criterion D: Create
For create, we were meant to write up the process of how we did our artwork. We should include some problems or difficulties we had while writing, what we learnt, and similar questions like these.
I think that i answered all of the questions or most of them that were there. I tried to include the whole process that i went through with a lot of details.
I think that if i could improve on writing the process more detailed and organized. After writing around 500 words i realized i wanted to add something to it, but i could add it to the place i wanted to so i had to put it later in the text. That's why it is pretty unorganized.

Presentation
For the presentation, i think i talked about everything that was mentioned on the grading criteria sheet we got. I think i could have went into more depth with the process of how i got my artwork, but looking back at everyone else's presentations, no one really went that deep either. No one had any questions, because i probably answered everything during the presentation. Kyu had the only question i think, but he started talking about all my hidden meaning that i didn't even notice, which took him like 5 minutes, but it was funny. I never thought that anyone could come up with so many hidden meaning in my artwork except for me, but Kyu just had way too many ideas....ha ha. I think that the only problem or the thing i could have improved on is talking in more depth about the process and things, but i don't think it was necessary, because it would take at least 30 minutes to explain the process, which none of us had. I briefly talked about what being a risk taker means to me, but again not in much depth. It would take too much time to explain everything. I explained all the meanings of the medias i used and i hope i explained it clearly. I talked about how my test went and if it was accurate. I do think that my test was pretty accurate. One thing i forgot to mention there was the result of my testing were 66 percent correct, so i think that justifies how correct or accurate my test is. I would say for testing an artwork on how different medias represent us that was quite good result. I also could have talked about what kind of questions i asked during my test, but it was basically questions on how this media represents me oh how this part of the artwork represents me, so there werent any special questions that have nothing to do with my artwork there.